Pneumatic System Reliability Enhancement Through Condensation Control in Railway Maintenance Equipment

Authors

  • eko primadi hendri Politeknik Transportasi Darat Indonesia - STTD
  • Popik Montanasyah Politeknik Transportasi Darat Indonesia - STTD ,
  • Gadang Endrayanto Politeknik Transportasi Darat Indonesia - STTD ,
  • Irfan Hardiansah Politeknik Transportasi Darat Indonesia - STTD ,
  • Agus Sembodo Politeknik Transportasi Darat Indonesia - STTD ,
  • Fahri Kurniawan Politeknik Transportasi Darat Indonesia - STTD ,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37367/jpi.v9i2.505

Keywords:

Sistem Pneumatik, Kondensasi, Air Dryer, Escavator Geismar, Analisis Resiko

Abstract

Pneumatic systems are essential components in the operation of railway maintenance machinery, particularly in braking and stabilization functions. The tropical climate of Indonesia, characterized by high humidity, significantly increases the occurrence of condensation in compressed-air systems, resulting in corrosion, reduced component performance, and a heightened risk of failure. This study examines the failure mechanisms of pneumatic components in a Geismar excavator operated by the Railway Maintenance Depot in Ngrombo. The analysis employs Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), Risk Priority Number (RPN) assessment, the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), and a SWOT-based evaluation to identify the most effective mitigation strategies. The findings show that condensation is the dominant failure cause, with the highest RPN recorded in the Pneumatic–Hydraulic Converter (RPN = 378). TOPSIS results indicate that increasing maintenance frequency is the most effective mitigation option (score 0.7022), followed by the installation of an air dryer. Implementing these recommendations is projected to reduce failure probability by up to 68% and improve overall pneumatic system reliability from 72% to 94%. These findings provide a technical foundation for developing reliability-centered maintenance strategies for railway maintenance equipment operating in humid tropical environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] G. Chen, Y. Huang, W. Cai, and F. Ye, “Research on working principle and realization mode of electronic controlled air dryer,” 2021 4th World Conf. Mech. Eng. Intell. Manuf., pp. 547–550, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:246667679

[2] S. Xu, G. Wu, F. Liu, and X. Yang, “Influence of brake chamber pressure and effective cross-sectional area on time delay of pneumatic braking system,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 2383, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2383/1/012150.

[3] Geismar, Use and Maintenance Handbook. Milan: Geismar Italia, 2014.

[4] W. Riyanta, “HIRADC Analysis for Rolling Stock Body Lifting Ngrombo Railway Maintenance Center,” Civ. Eng. Collab., 2023, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:264995522

[5] R. Thahir, M. Wajdi, Anisa, Nurdiyanti, N. Fadhilah, and N. Magfirah, “Sosialisasi Risiko Keselamatan Kerja Balai Perawatan Perkeretaapian Ngrombo,” J. abdimas patikala, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 784–788, 2023.

[6] B. Li and Y. Lu, “Research on Technology and Maintenance of Train Control Center,” 2024 IEEE 2nd Int. Conf. Control. Electron. Comput. Technol., pp. 278–282, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:270314727

[7] M. Jeřábek, M. Volf, and L. Richter, “Air Drying in an Industrial Compressor,” MATEC Web Conf., 2022, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:252959762

[8] J. Yu and H. Wang, “The Implement of Hydraulic Control System for Large- Scale Railway Maintenance Equipment Based on PLC,” 2014. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:114635578

[9] D. C. Petrilean, A. C. Tataru, and D. Tataru, “Reduction of Energy Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Oil Injected Helicalscrew Compressors,” Min. Rev., vol. 31, pp. 100–106, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:277515825

[10] M. F. M. Idris and N. H. Saad, “Mid-Life Refurbishment Maintenance Strategy to Sustain Performance and Reliability of Train System,” Appl. Mech. Mater., vol. 899, pp. 238–252, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:219895921

[11] M. Ahmadi, S. M. H. Molana, and S. M. Sajadi, “A hybrid FMEA-TOPSIS method for risk management, case study: Esfahan Mobarakeh Steel Company,” Int. J. Process Manag. Benchmarking, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 397–408, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1504/IJPMB.2017.084913.

[12] O. H. Eyüboğlu, B. Dindar, and Ö. Gül, “Risk Assessment by Using Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) Based on Power Transformer Aging for Maintenance and Replacement Decision,” 2020 2nd Glob. Power, Energy Commun. Conf., pp. 251–255, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:226848866

[13] Y. Yuan, J. Wang, S. Wei, B. Cai, and H. Song, “Research on Identification of Maintenance Significant Items in Reliability Centered Maintenance for Train Control System,” 2019 IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Conf., pp. 2817–2822, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:208632653

[14] J. E. Sallis, G. Gripsrud, U. H. Olsson, and R. Silkoset, “Secondary Data and Observation,” Res. Methods Data Anal. Bus. Decis., 2021, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:240326193

[15] S. A. Mazhar, “Methods of Data Collection: A Fundamental Tool of Research,” J. Integr. Community Heal., vol. 10, no. 01, pp. 6–10, 2021, doi: 10.24321/2319.9113.202101.

[16] H. Liu, L.-E. Wang, Z. Li, and Y.-P. Hu, “Improving Risk Evaluation in FMEA With Cloud Model and Hierarchical TOPSIS Method,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 27, pp. 84–95, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:57378111

[17] S. Chakraborty, “TOPSIS and Modified TOPSIS: A Comparative Analysis,” Decis. Anal. J., 2021, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:243066283

[18] K.-H. Chang, Y.-C. Chang, and Y.-T. Lee, “Integrating TOPSIS and DEMATEL Methods to Rank the Risk of Failure of FMEA,” Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak., vol. 13, pp. 1229–1258, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:43752476

[19] A. Q. Abdulhadi, “Review of Hybrid TOPSIS with other Methods,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 9, no. 14, 2019, doi: 10.6007/ijarbss/v9-i14/6504.

[20] S.-A. Mirhosseini, “Collecting Data Through Observation,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:229198641

Downloads

Published

2025-11-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

hendri, eko primadi, Popik Montanasyah, Gadang Endrayanto, Irfan Hardiansah, Agus Sembodo, & Fahri Kurniawan. (2025). Pneumatic System Reliability Enhancement Through Condensation Control in Railway Maintenance Equipment. Jurnal Perkeretaapian Indonesia (Indonesian Railway Journal), 9(2), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.37367/jpi.v9i2.505