Reliability Improvement Of Overhead Catenary System For Electric Train: A Review

Authors

  • Edwin Rozzaq Prasetiyo Faculty of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Institut Teknologi Bandung , Faculty of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Satrio Wicaksono Fakultas Teknik Mesin dan Dirgantara, Institut Teknologi Bandung , Fakultas Teknik Mesin dan Dirgantara, Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Tri Desmana Rachmilda Sekolah Teknik Elektro dan Informatika, Institut Teknologi Bandung , Sekolah Teknik Elektro dan Informatika, Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Vani Virdyawan Fakultas Teknik Mesin dan Dirgantara, Institut Teknologi Bandung , Fakultas Teknik Mesin dan Dirgantara, Institut Teknologi Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37367/jpi.v9i1.316

Keywords:

Overhead Catenary System, Reliability Improvement, Reliability analysis, Maintenance

Abstract

The overhead catenary system (OCS) is a critical component of electric trains that requires a reliable and safe operation. To improve the reliability of OCS, several methods and techniques can be used, including reliability analysis, design and construction improvement, modernization and digitization of monitoring, inspection, and maintenance, and optimization and implementation of maintenance methods and strategies.

Reliability analysis can help identify failure causes and minimize failure risks. Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA), Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), Event Tree Analysis (ETA), and Reliability Block Diagram (RBD) are some of the tools that can be used for reliability analysis on OCS. Design and construction improvements can be made by using high-quality materials and components. Applying superconducting cable on the feeder wire system and adding dampers on the steady arm to reduce mechanical wave amplitude can improve the regeneration rate, reduce the capacity of the required substation, and increase redundancy, thereby increasing reliability. Using 3D printing technology can improve consistency and accuracy in the production of OCS components, resulting in higher-quality products. Modernization and digitization of monitoring, inspection, and maintenance can be done using robots and cameras, improving safety, efficiency, and accuracy. Robots can be used for maintenance, while cameras can be used for monitoring and inspection. Predictive maintenance strategies can be used to anticipate maintenance needs and perform maintenance proactively, while maintenance optimization methods can improve maintenance efficiency and reduce costs. Implementing reliability-centered maintenance (RCM) and preventive opportunistic maintenance methods can enhance maintenance procedures, reduce maintenance schedules, and save costs. A proactive approach to maintenance is recommended to improve reliability and safety.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Garcia Alvarez, “The Advantages and Advances of Electric Railways [Viewpoint],” IEEE Electrif. Mag., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 64–60, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1109/MELE.2014.2339411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MELE.2014.2339411

Menteri Perhubungan Republik Indonesia, “PM 50 Tahun 2018 Perhubungan Tentang Persyaratan Teknis Instalasi Listrik Perkeretaapian.,” Mentri Perhub. Republik Indones., p. 13, 2018.

L. Yu, S. Gao, D. Zhang, G. Kang, D. Zhan, and C. Roberts, “A Survey on Automatic Inspections of Overhead Contact Lines by Computer Vision,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 10104–10125, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TITS.2021.3119023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2021.3119023

B. Hu and R. W. K. Chan, “Railway Overhead Wiring Structures in Australia: Review and Structural Assessment,” Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 3, 2022, doi: 10.3390/app12031492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031492

W. Wang, J. Loman, and P. Vassiliou, “Reliability importance of components in a complex system,” Proc. Annu. Reliab. Maintainab. Symp., pp. 6–11, 2004, doi: 10.1109/rams.2004.1285415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2004.1285415

A. Beagles, D. Fletcher, M. Peffers, P. Mak, and C. Lowe, “Validation of a new model for railway overhead line dynamics,” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Transp., vol. 169, no. 5, pp. 339–349, 2016, doi: 10.1680/jtran.16.00020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/jtran.16.00020

G. Jing, X. Qin, H. Wang, and C. Deng, “Developments, challenges, and perspectives of railway inspection robots,” Autom. Constr., vol. 138, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104242

D. Zhan, D. Jing, M. Wu, D. Zhang, L. Yu, and T. Chen, “An Accurate and Efficient Vision Measurement Approach for Railway Catenary Geometry Parameters,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 67, no. 12, pp. 2841–2853, 2018, doi: 10.1109/TIM.2018.2830862. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2018.2830862

J. Chen, Z. Liu, H. Wang, A. Nunez, and Z. Han, “Automatic defect detection of fasteners on the catenary support device using deep convolutional neural network,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 257–269, 2018, doi: 10.1109/TIM.2017.2775345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2017.2775345

Z. Liu, W. Liu, and Z. Han, “A high-precision detection approach for catenary geometry parameters of electrical railway,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 1798–1808, 2017, doi: 10.1109/TIM.2017.2666358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2017.2666358

D. Feng, S. Lin, Z. He, X. Sun, and W. J. Lee, “Optimization Method With Prediction-Based Maintenance Strategy for Traction Power Supply Equipment Based on Risk Quantification,” IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 961–970, 2018, doi: 10.1109/TTE.2018.2863550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TTE.2018.2863550

K. Tirapong and S. Titti, “Reliability improvement of distribution system using reliability centered maintenance,” Proc. IEEE Power Eng. Soc. Transm. Distrib. Conf., 2014, doi: 10.1109/tdc.2014.6863360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TDC.2014.6863360

F. Kiessling, R. Puschmann, A. Schmieder, and E. Schneider, Contact lines for electric railways : planning, design, implementation. 2001.

A. Rausand, M., & Hoyland, System reliability theory: models, statistical methods, and applications. John Wiley & Sons, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119373940

D. J. Smith, Reliability, maintainability and risk: practical methods for engineers. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2021.

E. R. Ziegel, System Reliability Theory: Models, Statistical Methods, and Applications, vol. 46, no. 4. 2004. doi: 10.1198/tech.2004.s242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/tech.2004.s242

B. H. Ku and J. M. Cha, “Reliability assessment of catenary of electric railway by using FTA and ETA analysis,” 2011 10th Int. Conf. Environ. Electr. Eng. EEEIC.EU 2011 - Conf. Proc., 2011, doi: 10.1109/EEEIC.2011.5874633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EEEIC.2011.5874633

W.-L. Chan, “A Study on Reliability of Conventional Railway Overhead Catenary System,” J. Labour, Occup. Saf. Heal., vol. 24, pp. 115–127, 2016.

Q. Mahboob and E. Zio, “Handbook of RAMS in Railway Systems: Theory and Practice,” Handb. RAMS Railw. Syst. Theory Pract., pp. 1–745, 2018, doi: 10.1201/b21983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b21983

H. Ohsaki, Z. Lv, N. Matsushita, M. Sekino, T. Koseki, and M. Tomita, “Superconducting power cable application in DC electric railway systems,” IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., vol. 23, no. 3, 2013, doi: 10.1109/TASC.2013.2237874. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2013.2237874

W. Chu, Y. Song, F. Duan, and Z. Liu, “Development of steady arm damper for electrified railway overhead contact line with double pantographs based on numerical and experimental analysis,” IET Electr. Syst. Transp., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 269–277, 2021, doi: 10.1049/els2.12024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/els2.12024

K. Lee and H. Jung, “An improvement of manufacturing process using 3D printing technology for overhead line components on railway electrification,” J. Electr. Eng. Technol., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 3085–3091, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s42835-022-01209-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-022-01209-w

R. Miller, F. Abbasi, and J. Mohammadpour, “Power line robotic device for overhead line inspection and maintenance,” Ind. Rob., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 75–84, 2017, doi: 10.1108/IR-06-2016-0165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IR-06-2016-0165

M. Karakose and O. Yaman, “Complex Fuzzy System Based Predictive Maintenance Approach in Railways,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Informatics, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 6023–6032, 2020, doi: 10.1109/TII.2020.2973231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2020.2973231

M. G. Deighton, Manejo de mantenimiento. 2016. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-801764-7/00005-X.

E. K. Youn and K. H. Choi, “A study on RCM approach to catenary system of electric railway,” Trans. Korean Inst. Electr. Eng., vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 1457–1465, 2016, doi: 10.5370/KIEE.2016.65.8.1457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5370/KIEE.2016.65.8.1457

S. Lin, N. Li, X. Sun, and D. Feng, “Research on Maintenance Efficiency Optimization for the Catenary System of Electrified Railways,” 2021 IEEE IAS Ind. Commer. Power Syst. Asia, I CPS Asia 2021, pp. 942–947, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ICPSAsia52756.2021.9621505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPSAsia52756.2021.9621505

H. Cheng, Y. Cao, J. Wang, W. Zhang, and H. Zeng, “A preventive, opportunistic maintenance strategy for the catenary system of high-speed railways based on reliability,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F J. Rail Rapid Transit, vol. 234, no. 10, pp. 1149–1155, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0954409719884215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409719884215

R. Wijaya et al., "Tropical Climate Effects on Railway Catenary Systems: A Case Study of Indonesian Infrastructure," J. Rail Eng., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 45-59, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jre.2023.04.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jre.2023.04.005

L. Chen et al., "Graphene-Enhanced HTS Cables for High-Humidity Environments," Mater. Today Energy, vol. 28, p. 101072, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtener.2023.101072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2022.101072

A. Nguyen et al., "Digital Twin Implementation for Railway Catenary in Developing Countries," IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 112543-112556, 2023. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3317892 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3317892

T. Sato, "Edge AI for Real-Time Catenary Monitoring with Sparse Data," Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 124, p. 106591, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106591 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106591

Downloads

Published

2025-04-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Prasetiyo, E. R., Wicaksono, S., Rachmilda, T. D., & Virdyawan, V. (2025). Reliability Improvement Of Overhead Catenary System For Electric Train: A Review. Jurnal Perkeretaapian Indonesia (Indonesian Railway Journal), 9(1), 44-56. https://doi.org/10.37367/jpi.v9i1.316

Most read articles by the same author(s)