Review Of Risk Identification Of Pipeline Buried Under Railroad Tracks

Authors

  • Angga Nurdiansyah Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Leonardo Gunawan Institut Teknologi Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37367/jpi.v7i2.286

Keywords:

risk identification, trains, railway, pipeline, buried

Abstract

The presence of pipes beneath railway lines poses potential risks and hazards to railway operations. Identification of the risks arising from pipes located under railway lines is necessary for evaluation and preparation of strategic measures to reduce the level of risk. Risks to be aware of include pipe deformation, corrosion, design and installation errors, and operating errors. To ensure safety, pipe monitoring and inspection must be conducted regularly. Pipe inspection also needs to consider geotechnical elements to ensure that railway infrastructure remains safe for operation. This paper reviews several published studies and standards related to the safety of pipelines under the railways and summarizes the potential failures of pipelines located beneath railway tracks, various aspect of pipelines and railway safety, and the standards that can be used as references in designing pipelines buried beneath railway tracks

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. H. S. Garmabaki, S. Marklund, A. Thaduri, A. Hedström, and U. Kumar, “Underground pipelines and railway infrastructure – failure consequences and restrictions,” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 412–430, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1080/15732479.2019.1666885.

M. Ranilovic, “Organizing the Crossing of a Gas Pipeline over Guduca Canyon,” Procedia Eng., vol. 69, pp. 871–880, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.03.065.

T. Dahlberg and T. Dahlberg, “Railway track settlements - a literature review,” pp. 0–41, 2004.

W. Kent Muhlbauer, Pipeline Risk Management Manual. Elsevier, 2004. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-7506-7579-6.X5000-6.

The British Standards Institution, “EN 50126‑1:2017 Railway Applications - The Specification and Demonstration of Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS) Part 1 - Generic RAMS Process,” BSI Stand. Ltd. 2017, 2017.

The British Standards Institution, “EN 50126‑2:2017 Railway Applications - The Specification and Demonstration of Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS) Part 2 - Systems Approach to Safety,” BSI Stand. Ltd. 2017, 2017.

Q. Mahboob and E. Zio, Handbook Of RAMS in Railway System Theory and Practice. Taylor & Francis, 2018.

M. An, Y. Chen, and C. J. Baker, “A fuzzy reasoning and fuzzy-analytical hierarchy process based approach to the process of railway risk information: A railway risk management system,” Inf. Sci. (Ny)., vol. 181, no. 18, pp. 3946–3966, Sep. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2011.04.051.

American Petroleum Institute, Steel Pipelines Crossing Railroads and Highways, Seventh Ed., no. November 2008. 2007.

D. Zhang et al., “Field experiment and numerical investigation on the mechanical response of buried pipeline under traffic load,” Eng. Fail. Anal., vol. 142, p. 106734, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106734.

J. Zhang, Z. Liang, H. Zhang, D. Feng, and C. Xia, “Failure analysis of directional crossing pipeline and design of a protective device,” Eng. Fail. Anal., vol. 66, pp. 187–201, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.04.019.

J. L. Otegui, “Challenges to the integrity of old pipelines buried in stable ground,” Eng. Fail. Anal., vol. 42, pp. 311–323, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.04.025.

S. Vishnuvardhan, A. R. Murthy, and A. Choudhary, “A review on pipeline failures, defects in pipelines and their assessment and fatigue life prediction methods,” Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip., vol. 201, p. 104853, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.104853.

B. James and A. Hudgins, “Failure analysis of oil and gas transmission pipelines,” in Handbook of Materials Failure Analysis with Case Studies from the Oil and Gas Industry, Elsevier, 2016, pp. 1–38. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100117-2.00001-7.

M. Wasim and M. B. Djukic, “External corrosion of oil and gas pipelines: A review of failure mechanisms and predictive preventions,” J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., vol. 100, p. 104467, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104467.

M. Krechowicz, W. Gierulski, S. Loneragan, and H. Kruse, “External Risk Factors Evaluation in Horizontal Directional Drilling Technology Using Failure Mode and Effect Analysis,” Manag. Prod. Eng. Rev., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 76–88, 2022, doi: 10.24425/mper.2022.140878.

C. D. F. Rogers et al., “Condition assessment of the surface and buried infrastructure - A proposal for integration,” Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 202–211, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2011.10.012.

S. Iwnicki, Handbook of railway vehicle dynamics. 2006. doi: 10.1201/9781420004892.

H. Nie et al., “Study on buckling deformation mechanism of pipeline crossing road,” Eng. Fail. Anal., vol. 139, p. 106412, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106412.

gatra.com, “Pipa Pertamina Bocor di Tarisi Cilacap.” https://www.gatra.com/news-449580-ekonomi-pipa-pertamina-bocor-di-tarisi-cilacap.html

N. Siswantoro, M. B. Zaman, and D. Priyanta, “The Implementation of API RP 1102 Code to Evaluate Gas Pipeline Road Crossing,” in Proceeding of Marine Safety and Maritime Installation (MSMI 2018), 2018, no. Msmi, pp. 240–248. doi: 10.23977/msmi.2018.82626.

U. A. Campos, D. Koo, J. Robison, and G. W. Castleberry, “Trenchless Technologies in Railroad Utility Crossing: Considerations, Allowed Construction Methods, and Economic Implications,” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr., vol. 25, no. 3, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000488.

D. Howell, U. Campos, and D. Koo, “Trenchless Pipeline Construction for Railroad Crossing; Challenges and Lessons Learned,” North Am. Soc. Trenchless Technol., pp. 1–9, 2014.

W. H. P. A. Megantoro, “Integrity Assessment of Wall Distorted of Buried Gas Pipeline,” Kapal J. Ilmu Pengetah. dan Teknol. Kelaut., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2023, doi: 10.14710/kapal.v20i1.48231.

J. Manna and B. Duari, “Effect of Vehicular Movement on Petroleum Pipelines at Road Crossing and Cathodic Protection,” Certif. Int. J. Eng. Innov. Technol., vol. 9001, no. 9, pp. 2277–3754, 2008.

A. Awad, D. Ph, P. Eng, D. K. M. Sc, and P. Eng, “A Geotechnical insight into a pipeline crossing”.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-31

How to Cite

Nurdiansyah, A., & Gunawan, L. (2023). Review Of Risk Identification Of Pipeline Buried Under Railroad Tracks. Jurnal Perkeretaapian Indonesia (Indonesian Railway Journal), 7(2), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.37367/jpi.v7i2.286

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.