Study of the Conflict Level in Commuter Train Entry and Exit Movements at Terminus Stations

Authors

  • Nanda Ahda Imron Politeknik Perkeretaapian Indonesia Madiun
  • Muhammad Farid Almas Politeknik Perkeretaapian Indonesia Madiun
  • Muhammad Nurhadi Politeknik Perkeretaapian Indonesia Madiun
  • Rusman Prihatanto Politeknik Perkeretaapian Indonesia Madiun

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37367/jpi.v7i2.314

Keywords:

Trips , Interlocking, Conflicting Route, Conflict Rate

Abstract

Terminus station is a railway station that becomes the starting/ending point of a train journey. Bogor Station is one of the terminus stations that is very busy for Jabodetabek Commuter Train (KRL) trips. There are 8 lines to support train departing and arriving at this station. The departure line (IV to VIII) intersects with the KRL arrival line causing a conflict route. That is, the oncoming KRL is held back by the entry signal because it prioritises the departing KRL, so it is necessary to study the level of conflict. The conflict rate method is used to analyze the level of conflict by comparing variants of complex interlocking patterns at the station using the train movement definition table. The analysis results of existing conditions with loading on each route, found a conflict rate value of 81% (out of 329 trains, 266 trains are potentially affected by conflict routes). Then “path engineering” was carried out with various alternatives. Alternative 1 by changing the track list on some trains, the conflict rate value for passing trains dropped to 79% (260 trains affected). Alternative 2 with the addition of connecting lines, the conflict rate value dropped to 77% (253 trains affected). While alternative 3 with track extension, the conflict rate value drops to 74% (243 trains affected). The results show that alternative 3 is considered more efficient in supporting train operations than alternatives 1 and 2

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

UU 23, Undang - Undang 23 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perkeretaapian, Jakarta, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta: Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, 2007.

KP 1380, Keputusan Menteri Perhubungan Tentang Penetapan Grafik Perjalanan Kereta Api Tahun 2021, Jakarta, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta: Kementerian Perhubungan, 2020.

PDPS Stasiun Bogor, Peraturan Dinas Pelayanan Setempat (PDPS) Stasiun Bogor, Jakarta, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta: PT Kereta Api Indonesia DAOP 1 Jakarta, 2022.

Daftar Jalur Stasiun Bogor, Jalur - Jalur yang Harus Dilalui di Stasiun Bogor (PD 19 Jilid I Pasal 55), Bogor, Jawa Barat: Stasiun Besar A Bogor, 2022.

PD 19 Jilid I, Peraturan Dinas 19 Jilid I Terkait Urusan Perjalanan Kereta Api dan Langsir, Bandung, Jawa Barat: PT Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero), 2011.

KBBI, "https://kbbi.web.id/rekayasa," 2023. [Online]. Available: https://kbbi.web.id/rekayasa. [Accessed 6 July 2023].

PD 22 Jilid I, Peraturan Dinas 22 Jilid I Terkait Penguasaan Stasiun, Bandung, Jawa Barat: PT Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero), 2012.

M. Hanif, H. Moetriono and S. W. Mudjanarko, "Analisis Pola Operasi Kereta Api Di Stasiun Surabaya Gubeng," Spirit Pro Patria, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-15, Maret 2020.

PD 13, Peraturan Dinas 13 Terkait Ketentuan Umum Persinyalan, Bandung, Jawa Barat: PT Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero), 2015.

Daftar Perjalanan Kereta Api Stasiun Bogor, Daftar Perjalanan Kereta Api Stasiun Bogor GAPEKA 2021, Bogor, Jawa Barat: Stasiun Besar A Bogor, 2022.

PM 121, Peraturan Menteri 121 Tahun 2017 Tentang Lalu Lintas Kereta Api, Jakarta, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta: Kementerian Perhubungan, 2017.

J. Pachl, Railway Operation and Control, Braunschweig: VTD Rail Publishing, 2009.

PD 19 Jilid II, Peraturan Dinas 19 Jilid II Terkait Kereta Api Kerja, Kereta Api Inspeksi, dan Lori, Bandung, Jawa Barat: PT Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero), 2011.

Sukamto, Metode Penulisan Karya Ilmiah, Malang, Jawa Timur: Badan Penerbitan Universitas Widyagama, 2016.

D. M. Setiawan, "Analisis Pola Operasi Lalu Lintas Kereta Api Pada Stasiun Berjalur Empat dan Enam dengan Metode Conflict Rate," Jurnal Perkeretaapian Indonesia, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 57-70, Oktober 2022.

PM 60, Peraturan Menteri 60 Tahun 2012 Tentang Persyaratan Teknis Jalur Kereta Api, Jakarta, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta: Kementerian Perhubungan, 2012.

S. H. T. Utomo, Jalan Rel, vol. 2, Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta: Beta Offset, 2009.

PD 10, Peraturan Dinas 10 Terkait Perencanaan Konstruksi Jalan Rel, Bandung, Jawa Barat: Perusahaan Jawatan Kereta Api, 1986.

PT KAI, Simple Turnout R. 54 (1 : 10), Bandung, Jawa Barat: PT Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero), 2014.

N. Muhadjir, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Pendekatan Positivistik, Rasionalistik, Phenomenologik, dan Realisme Metaphisik Telaah Studi Teks dan Penelitian Agama, Yogyakarta, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta: Rake Sarasin, 1996.

Published

2023-10-31 — Updated on 2024-04-01

Versions

How to Cite

Imron, N. A., Almas, M. F., Nurhadi, M., & Prihatanto, R. (2024). Study of the Conflict Level in Commuter Train Entry and Exit Movements at Terminus Stations. Jurnal Perkeretaapian Indonesia (Indonesian Railway Journal), 7(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.37367/jpi.v7i2.314 (Original work published October 31, 2023)

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.