Study of Concrete Bearing Behavior for 1067 mm Track Width with Variation in Track Quality Index (TQI) Values

Authors

  • Wawarisa Alnu Fistcar Universitas Selamat Sri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37367/jpi.v5i1.152

Keywords:

Track Quality Indexs

Abstract

There are many factors that affect the decline in the quality of the railways including the stability of the geometry, the resistance of the upper structure and the lowwer structure of the railways. This research was conducted to determine the effect of geometry instability on the resistance railways structure that is focused on the structure of the railways. In assessing the geometry deviation value of the path using the calculation of the standard deviation each measurement parameter which is then processed into a track quality indexs (TQI). Measurement parameter data is obtained from Galunggung measuring train for 2018 and EM-120 measuring train for 2019. Differences in the calculation of the value of railways quality (TQI) with different years are used as a benchmark for determining the location of a manual survey using a measurement tool and meter listring. The results of field geometry measurements are modeled with a program to help calculate structural strength. Model simulation by analyzing using Finite Element Method (FEM) for several conditions according to the geometry deviation category (TQI). The results of this study found that, concrete sleeper material properties, with concrete compressive (Fc ') 54 MPa and 1400 MPa prestressed wire strength (Fy), rail type is R.54 and ballast property according to PM.60 of 2012. The axial load is working at 16,241 kg, From the analysis of the geometric deviation value of category 3 (25 <TQI <40), it was found that concrete sleeper specimen (B4) experienced compressive stress of 15,566 MPa and tensile stress of 5,178 MPa. Analysis of these conditions, concrete bearings can not rely on the required tensile force that is, 4,632 MPa (0.32 Fc0.67).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Attard, M. M., and S. Setunge. 1996. “Stress-Strain Relationship of Confined and Unconfined Concrete.” ACI Materials Journal 93(5): 432–42.

Aulia, Rayhana., and Danang Parikesit. 2017. “Perencanaan Pemeliharaan Jalan Reldaop vi Yogyakarta.” Prosiding Simposium II – UNIID 2017 (September): 978–79.

Berawi, Abdur Rohim Boy, Raimundo Delgado, Rui Calçada, and Cecilia Vale. 2010. “Evaluating Track Geometrical Quality through Different Methodologies.” International Journal of Technology 1(1): 38–47.

Bowles, Josep E. 1997. 20 Engineering Geology Foundation Analysis and Design Fifth Edition.

Esveld, C. 2001. Delft university of technologi Modern Railway Track. Second.

Fistcar, Wawarisa Alnu, Hera Widyastuti, Data Iranata, and Catur Arif Prastyanto. 2020. “Pengaruh Parameter Track Quality Indeks (Tqi) Terhadap Perilaku Bantalan Beton.” Jurnal Aplikasi Teknik Sipil 18(1): 131.

Iranata, Data, Endah Wahyuni, and Hidayat Soegihardjo. 2010. “Ductile Design of Beam-Column Connection for Earthquake Resistant Precast Concrete House.” (October).

Lasisi, Ahmed, and Nii Attoh-Okine. 2018. “Principal Components Analysis and Track Quality Index: A Machine Learning Approach.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 91(March 2018): 230–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.04.001.

Liu, Reng-Kui et al. 2015. “Establishment of Track Quality Index Standard Recommendations for Beijing Metro.” Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 2015: 1–9.

Mander, John Barrie. 1989. “Conducted Providing the Stress-Strain Relation for the Concrete and Steel Are- Known . The Moments and Curvatures Associated with Increasing Flexural Deformations of the Column May Be Computed for Various Column Axial Loads by Incrementing the Curvature A.” 114(8): 1804–26.

Michał, Szczecina, and Winnicki Andrzej. “Calibration of the CDP Model Parameters in Abaqus.”

Murat Saatcioglu & Razvi Salim. 1999. “Strength and Ductility of Hybrid FRP-Concrete.” J. Struct. Eng., 9445(October): 281–289.

Ren, Wei, Lesley H. Sneed, Yang Yang, and Ruili He. 2015. “Numerical Simulation of Prestressed Precast Concrete Bridge Deck Panels Using Damage Plasticity Model.” International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials 9(1): 45–54.

Samani, Ali Khajeh, and Mario M. Attard. 2012. “A Stress-Strain Model for Uniaxial and Confined Concrete under Compression.” Engineering Structures 41: 335–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.027.

Wantana Havino, Arisma, Hera Widyastuti, and Catur Prasetyanto. 2021. “Jurnal Penelitian Transportasi Darat.” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 53(9): 1689–99. http://ppid.dephub.go.id/files/datalitbang/JURNAL_DARAT_2015.pdf.

Wijaya Karya. 2016. “Railway Sleeper Prestressted Wijaya Karya Beton.”

Downloads

Published

2021-06-21

How to Cite

Fistcar, W. A. (2021). Study of Concrete Bearing Behavior for 1067 mm Track Width with Variation in Track Quality Index (TQI) Values. Jurnal Perkeretaapian Indonesia (Indonesian Railway Journal), 5(1), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.37367/jpi.v5i1.152

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.